Austin Cop Goes to Wrong House, Shoots Dog

A few days ago on Facebook I saw a photo of what looked like a little dog sleeping, wrapped in a red blanket.   I read the attached story, & it turns out that it was a 7-yr-old Blue Heeler named Cisco, who had been shot to death by an Austin police officer who had surprised Cisco & his owner while they were playing frisbee, menaced the owner, then shot Cisco when Cisco reacted with alarm.

Since then, his bereaved owner, Michael Paxton, has created a Facebook page called Justice for Cisco.   He says that his aim is not to persecute the APD but to spread awareness so that this kind of tragedy doesn’t keep happening.   As a dog owner, I totally support this.   It’s terrible to think that some cop can randomly charge into my home for no reason, shoot my dog, & then yell at me about it.   I have a lot of friends in HPD & I’d love to think of them as our protectors & heroes, not as rabid murderers.   When things like this happen, though, how can one feel safe?

I watched the APD dashboard camera footage.   Officer Griffin has his gun drawn before he’s out of the camera’s view.   At 00:12 he shouts “Hey, show me your hands, show me your hands! Get your dog!” & at 00:16 he shoots Paxton’s dog.   Not even a second passes between “Get your dog” & the gunshot.

There are a lot of arguments in the comments section about who was at fault.   From what I can gather:

1. The dispatch gave the cop the wrong address; that part wasn’t the cop’s fault.
2. The suspect’s description didn’t match Paxton at all.
3. The cop says the dog was attacking him; Paxton says he wasn’t.

According to this KVUE article, Austin PD policy regarding pets is “In circumstances where officers encounter any animal which reasonably appears, under the circumstances, to pose and imminent threat to the safety of officers or others, officers are authorized to use deadly force to neutralize such a threat.”

It goes on to say that officers are encouraged to use non-deadly means of neutralization, like tazers, if possible.   However, that was not possible since the officer was focused on pointing his gun & yelling at Michael Paxton.

This piece on The Agitator describes how common it is for law officials to shoot pets indiscriminately in order to do their job.   There is even a story of SWAT forcing a terrified dog into a burning house to its death & laughing while the owners protest.

Personally, I don’t think the Austin PD are evil.   But I do think this was totally avoidable.   This was a stupid thing to happen, & the ones paying for it are the innocents.

Officer Griffin entered Paxton’s property in a state of excitement.  He had already drawn his gun.   Upon encountering the presumably stunned man in his own garage, Officer Griffin immediately threatened him with deadly force & yelled at him.

Paxton was probably just standing there staring at him in surprise.   It was not necessary to point the gun or even to shout.   Especially since Paxton didn’t even match the perpetrator’s description.

When the dog came charging out barking, Paxton was unable to hold his hands up in the air at gunpoint & grab his dog simultaneously.   Griffin kept shouting, & then shot the dog, probably faster than the dog could even have figured out what was going on sufficient to decide to attack.

So all of this is stupid.   Officer Griffin is a big guy.   He’s tall.   Cisco was a 50 lb Blue Heeler, & in the picture he doesn’t even look 50 lbs.   He has a relatively small mouth; it’s not like he’s going to deliver a bite like a pit bull or a rottweiler.   He’s a herding dog.   A shepherd dog.   I’m barely over 5′ & I would not feel mortally threatened by a Blue Heeler barking at me.   Even if it did bite me, I doubt I’d need stitches.

When I pointed this out, one of the other commenters on YouTube said “So cops are supposed to be dog experts?”   This is a good point.   Maybe we need to have some kind of education for our police departments on how to handle aggressive dogs, as well as how to tell when one is not actually going to attack.

Cops are different from the rest of us.   They are allowed to shoot us if they think they need to.   They are allowed to tell us what to do without restriction if they think they need to.   With that power comes certain expectations.   We expect them to be able to think fast, & to think accurately.   It doesn’t appear that Officer Griffin did this.   He went in yelling, created a completely unnecessary panicked situation, & then shot a pet that was only reacting in the way a loyal pet would.

Maybe educational courses on dogs would help.   Maybe harsher (or, simply, existent)penalties for killing civilians’ pets would cause someone to think twice (or even once) before discharging his gun.   I’m totally open to rational discussion on this.   I am a dog owner & I know that if someone climbed over the wall into my yard, even if they were on their way to raid some other adjacent house, my dogs would definitely bark at them.   I’m not sure if my dogs would attack but they might.   If a big guy was physically threatening me Boomer probably would.   I don’t know; it’s something I hope I never have to find out.

But if it does happen, I’d like to think that there’s a chance my dogs would not be used for target practice just for behaving the way they are supposed to.


4 responses to “Austin Cop Goes to Wrong House, Shoots Dog

  1. So right about cops. they’re supposed to be able to think fast and handle high tension situations. they should have better judgement.

  2. it’s seems that i have read somewhere where dogs have been hero’s in helping police and military in many ways. It would seem if you could get the police and military already familiar with all the positive attributes that dogs have familiar with these issues they could be helpful to those that have no idea and possibly an intrinsic fear of all dogs with any amount of aggression. I have a blue heeler almost identical to cisco and if startled i think she would jump at an intruder and possibly nip at them but am not sure what would actually happen in some kind of struggle, usually you yell at her a bit and she calms down, mainly just barks alot. I am not impressed sometimes at the unwillingness to at least review in depth a situation as awful as this so as to learn from our mistakes. A good friend used to pronounce the word Ignorance IG-norance, that ignoring things is what truly makes you ignorant. Add a little arrogance and thinking your more important than those you are supposed to serve and you have a real problem.

    • I agree. I just mentioned in comments on the other post my frustration with a police friend’s defensive attitude about this issue as well as his refusal to even consider education as a solution. Thing is, he’s a great guy & he’s been nothing but awesome to my dogs. It’s difficult to fathom. I hate to say it but at this point I feel that we have to be very defensive when it comes to visits from the authorities. Be prepared at any moment to lock your dog in a crate or somewhere it can’t possibly be deemed a threat. I’d even be hesitant to call 911 at all.

      With 3 large dogs, I myself will just be prepared to get shot along with them. They’d better shoot me.

  3. Until we get big names with high profiles (maybe Judge Judy who is a very vocal dog lover) and get protective laws in place, it will not change, and will possibly get worse. As far as the cops chasing the dog into the fire, that IS a prosecutable offense; here in the Tyler TX area, we just had a guy arrested for that very thing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s